Genre, as defined by dictionary.com is "a class or
category of artistic endeavor having a particular form, content, technique, or
the like." Genres can be anything from mystery novels, letters, to even
texts of Twitter posts. Almost everything we see, read, and perceive is a genre
of its own. This definition can make genres sound like meticulous and strict
groups of identical items, but if we really take time to examine genres around
us we are able to discern the vast variety of possibilities within one genre.
Because of the flexibility of genres, the internet has been flooded with
"genre generators" that can pretty much generate just about
everything within a genre without necessarily wandering out of the genre's
conventions. These "genre generators" can help the ordinary genre
novice to learn more about genres by allowing him to examine which conventions
prevail throughout the randomly generated genres.
In order to understand more about genres and their
conventions in relation to genre generators, I visited four different genre
generators. The first genre generator I visited was
SCIgen,(pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen) which is a website that can supposedly
publish a research paper "written" by you or someone else by simply
entering your or any other name. Now, just because it generates a paper doesn't
necessarily mean it makes any sense. Through not so careful examination, it's
easy to see that the generated paper, well, makes no sense. However, at a quick
glance it could fool just about everyone. But how is this possible? Well, when
you think of a research paper there are several things that come to mind in
terms of what it should include and what it should look like. When someone
thinks of a research paper they probably think of an extremely long paper with
countless so-called "big" words and an extensive list of sources and
just as many authors. This is exactly what SCIgen provides you with. It
generates a "research" paper with a fancy title, the
"authors," plenty of "big words," many, many pages, and a
lengthy list of sources. So, if to the regular onlooker this paper looks like
any other research paper, then these expectations might represent the
conventions of the genre of a research paper. This is not to say that research
papers are by any means simple, but that by meeting certain expectations or
conventions, anything has the ability to pass of (at least for a short period
of time) as a certain genre.
The second website I visited was pandyland.net/random.
Pandyland is a website that generates a random and probably ill-humored comic
strip by randomly assembling three random pre-drawn images including the same
two characters, Simon and Finlay. Seeing these two average looking dudes on the
same, monotone, purplish gray background again and again can seem boring, but
the combination of terrible jokes and awful facial expressions makes it a
worthwhile experience, at least for some. While I did not find all the
generated comics humorous, certain combinations made me chuckle. After
generating many of these comics I realized that not much about them changed. As
previously stated, the three pictures always include Simon, Finlay, or both
plastered on a monotonous purplish gray background. Both of them are always
wearing the same boring outfits. Finlay wears a green long sleeved shirt and
jeans and Simon wears a burgundy long sleeved shirt with khakis. All these
traits sound awfully boring, but add some crude humor that somehow makes fun of
modern society, funny facial expressions, and bam-- you have created a
hilarious comic at the click of a button. Pandyland didn't always turn out
funny, but the conventions of a comic strip were always present.
The third genre generator I visited was memegenerator.net.
MemeGenerator required a bit more effort than the previous, as I had to choose
an image and then caption it myself. I was too lazy to make my own, but by
looking at the already existing memes I was able to decipher the conventions of
a meme: a funny picture, a not always funny caption, and the uncomfortable
feeling of having seen the meme (just kidding, or maybe not, judge this
yourself).
Genre generators don't always generate something that makes
sense, but by giving the generated genres a second look it is easy to see that
these genre generators work because they all do one thing in common: they all
meet the conventions of a genre.




The opening paragraph is structured nicely, and helps introduce the reader to the topic as well as laying out what the topics are going to be heading into the body paragraphs. The examples you provided helped to support your argument immensely and fit in nicely with the flow of the paper. Also, the other generator you provided made as little sense as the SCIgen generator, but I still found it funny that this random jumble of words was still a haiku. I felt that we both had the same stance in terms of the generators are only successful because they are able to follow a set of conventions that allow them to fit inside a genre. Overall, your paper was great and was a fun read.
ReplyDeleteP.s. The set-up to your blog is super cool!
Thanks so much!!! I'll make sure to check out your posts soon :)
DeleteThe organization of the paper is really good. Dividing the information and conventions from each separate generator makes the essay easier to read and it also flows. I really like how you went in depth with each of the generators and really pulled out the conventions. The only thing I would have to say is that while touched on how these generators may help understand genre. You didn't describe how thinking about what happens in these generators may help someone better understand genre.
ReplyDeleteGrecia,
ReplyDeleteYour blog aesthetic is one of my favorite in the class. Is it hipster-y? It might be—I only mean it if you interpret that as a compliment. (That’s how I mean it.) The blog blurb you posted hit on some super-personal issues, and I appreciate your willingness (really) to share it with me and the rest of the class.
Re: PB1A, Tinder bios, wow! Good for you—this is one of the more outside-the-box selections I’ve seen. What you wrote right here—“Tinder bios are known for being funny, awkward, weird, and sometimes even a joke. Nevertheless, these biographies are not limited to jokes. Believe it or not, there are people out there who take mobile applications like Tinder seriously”—is a good way to think about how flexible genres can be. It’s not always a set-in-stone kind of thing.
Re: PB1B, I’m glad that you acknowledged the visual conventions of these genres, especially the cartoon one—however, I don’t want you losing sight of some of the thematic and stylistic conventions that we discussed in class. Form, content, and context all play off each other to help shape every given genre. Also, make sure you consider audience and purpose in your current/future genre analyses.
All told, excellent work here, Grecia. Excellent in-class participation too—I appreciate that.
Z